top of page
Original.png
write
guest post

TM

End Times News & Commentary

Supreme Court Questions Texas Law Banning Most Abortions

November 1, 2021

Supreme Court, NYC (10.2.2021) NYC Women's March. Sign was held of anger justice on abortion access in response to the Texas abortion law. (Royalty-free stock photo ID: 2053893005 by Balkan Press).

(AP) — A majority of the Supreme Court signaled Monday they would allow abortion providers to pursue a court challenge to a Texas law that has virtually ended abortion in the nation’s second-largest state after six weeks of pregnancy.


But it was unclear how quickly the court would rule and whether it would issue an order blocking the law that has been in effect for two months, or require providers to ask a lower court put the law on hold.


Two conservative justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, voted in September to allow the law to take effect, but they raised questions Monday about its novel structure. The law was written to make it difficult to mount legal challenges, and it subjects clinics, doctors and others who facilitate an abortion to large financial penalties.


“There’s a loophole that’s been exploited here, or used here,” Kavanaugh said, explaining that the question for the court is whether to “close that loophole.” Kavanaugh suggested that the “principle” and “whole sweep” of a 1908 Supreme Court case would “suggest extending the principle here, arguably” and closing the loophole.

The justices heard three hours of arguments Monday in two cases over whether abortion providers or the Justice Department can mount federal court challenges to the law, which has an unusual enforcement scheme its defenders argue shields it from federal court review.


The Biden administration filed its lawsuit after the justices voted 5-4 to refuse a request by providers to keep the law on hold. Three other conservative justices joined Barrett and Kavanaugh in the majority to let the law take effect. Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s three liberal justices in dissent.


The justices sounded less convinced that the Justice Department lawsuit should go forward, and Justice Elena Kagan suggested that a ruling instead in favor of the providers would allow the court to avoid difficult issues of federal power.


 

Story by By MARK SHERMAN and JESSICA GRESKO for the Associated Press. Cover image by "Icedmocha" on Shutterstock.

 

Watch Post Commentary: Abortion has always been a divisive topic. While one side argues that the issue is about the right to choose, the other stands on the principle that abortion is murder. Bible-believing Christians often cite Jeremiah 1:4-5 in defense of their pro-life stance. In these verses, God told the prophet:


"I knew you before I formed you in your mother's womb. Before you were born I set you apart and appointed you as my prophet to the nations."


Another verse commonly quoted is that of Psalm 139:13-14:


"For you created my inmost being, you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful. I know that full well."


It seems obvious that unborn babies are alive and that condoning a voluntary medical procedure that takes that life is wrong. Yet, the "lovers of self" (2 Tim 3) challenge even the most liberal of laws allowing them to commit murder in this manner, always fighting to make the act easier to achieve. While it's appalling that anyone would be opposed to the Texas law being disputed in this case, it certainly isn't surprising given the times in which we live.


What do you think?

コメント


Get notified when new commentary is published.

© 2021 | The Watch Post 

bottom of page